Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
DNA damage and repair are widely studied in relation to cancer and therapeutics. Y-family DNA polymerases can bypass DNA lesions, which may result from external or internal DNA damaging agents, including some chemotherapy agents. Overexpression of Y-family polymerase human pol kappa can result in tumorigenesis and drug resistance in cancer. This report describes the use of computational tools to predict the effects of single nucleotide polymorphism variants on pol kappa activity. Partial Order Optimum Likelihood (POOL), a machine learning method that uses input features from Theoretical Microscopic Titration Curve Shapes (THEMATICS), was used to identify amino acid residues most likely involved in catalytic activity. The μ4 value, a metric obtained from POOL and THEMATICS that serves as a measure of the degree of coupling between one ionizable amino acid and its neighbors, was then used to identify which protein mutations are likely to impact the biochemical activity. Bioinformatic tools SIFT, PolyPhen-2, and FATHMM predicted most of these variants to be deleterious to function. Along with computational and bioinformatic predictions, we characterized the catalytic activity and stability of seventeen cancer-associated DNA pol kappa variants. We identified pol kappa variants R48I, H105Y, G147D, G154E, V177L, R298C, E362V, and R470C as having lower activity relative to wild-type pol kappa; the pol kappa variants T102A, H142Y, R175Q, E210K, Y221C, N330D, N338S, K353T, and L383F were identified as similar in catalytic efficiency to WT pol kappa. We observed that POOL predictions can be used to predict which variants have decreased activity. Predictions from bioinformatic tools like SIFT, PolyPhen-2 and FATHMM are based on sequence comparisons and therefore are complementary to POOL but are less capable of predicting biochemical activity. These bioinformatic and computational tools can be used to identify SNP variants with deleterious effects and altered biochemical activity from a large data set.more » « less
-
Interactions in enzymes between catalytic and neighboring amino acids and how these interactions facilitate catalysis are examined. In examples from both natural and designed enzymes, it is shown that increases in catalytic rates may be achieved through elongation of the buffer range of the catalytic residues; such perturbations in the protonation equilibria are, in turn, achieved through enhanced coupling of the protonation equilibria of the active ionizable residues with those of other ionizable residues. The strongest coupling between protonation states for a pair of residues that deprotonate to form an anion (or a pair that accept a proton to form a cation) is achieved when the difference in the intrinsic pKas of the two residues is approximately within 1 pH unit. Thus, catalytic aspartates and glutamates are often coupled to nearby acidic residues. For an anion-forming residue coupled to a cation-forming residue, the elongated buffer range is achieved when the intrinsic pKa of the anion-forming residue is higher than the intrinsic pKa of the (conjugate acid of the) cation-forming residue. Therefore, the high pKa, anion-forming residues tyrosine and cysteine make good coupling partners for catalytic lysine residues. For the anion–cation pairs, the optimum difference in intrinsic pKas is a function of the energy of interaction between the residues. For the energy of interaction ε expressed in units of (ln 10)RT, the optimum difference in intrinsic pKas is within ∼1 pH unit of ε.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

Full Text Available